An Adopted Problem For New Mexico

New Mexico is on the verge of dumbing down education by adopting the Next Generation Science Standards with two adjustments for our state:

1) they are not supported by science,
2) they are not standard.

Here is the bigger problem:  I learned today in a consortium of legislators, educators, and researchers, that after taking public comment on the proposed adoption, whatever the outcome of that comment, the Public Education Department of Governor Martinez, most likely will adopt those faulty standards anyway.   They will say a “significant number” of public comment was in support of the adoption, (they won’t provide statistics, or they will play with semantics) and they’ll say districts have discretion, but the outcome will be that New Mexico will officially adopt the rule, bypassing all democratic processes.

After we restore policy for the people of New Mexico, we will need to dismantle the Secretary of Education post.  This example should be enough for people from all affiliations to realize the importance of elevating education out of the election cycle. The fact that the next administration can sweep away everything done in this administration, by passing “rules”, should convince everyone to change the mechanism to a more publicly accountable system. The volatility of policy should not undermine “the best of our knowledge”, which is what science education, and any education, is supposed to be.

To read the specifics of the proposed “rule” here is the LANL foundation position paper:

Word is, because of this “loophole”, we can expect many rules to be proclaimed over the next year.

Please still participate, to the best of our abilities we must.   Interested parties may provide comment on the proposed repeal and replacement of this state rule at the public hearing or may submit written comments, or both, to Jamie Gonzales, Policy Division, New Mexico Public Education Department, Room 101, 300 Don Gaspar Avenue, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501, or by electronic mail at, or fax to (505) 827-6681.  All written comments must be received no later than 5:00 p.m. (MDT) on the date of the public hearing.  The PED encourages the early submission of written comments.  The public comment period is from September 12, 2017 to October 16, 2017 at 5 p.m. (MDT)



Filed under Uncategorized

School Grades and Context

With the fresh start of each new school year, students, families, and teachers are welcomed back by the Public Education Department with a front-page story about the awful job they are doing, because apparently there isn’t enough animosity targeting schools.  The person substituting for the previous secretary of education has picked up where she left off, guns a’ blazing.  Important to school grades, and our community at large for passers-by and residents alike, is context.  Informing the community about that context would be encouragement, because, despite what is being touted at New Mexico’s Public Education Department, there is terrific work being done.  How’s the public flogging, testing, and underfunding of education helping that work?

The fact that scientists and mathematicians, locally and nationally, have disavowed, multiple times, the methods that the Public Education Department in New Mexico uses to grade students, teachers, and schools, should be noted with each article that is published, like the Surgeon General’s warning on cigarettes. (See references 1, 2, 3)  The public should know that there is little validity in the grades schools receive.  Media should juxtapose the “crime map” of the state with the “grade map“, and ask deeper questions, like “should we hold teachers accountable for the socioeconomic status of a child?“ which is still, after all is said and done, the closest correlation to test scores that we have.

Communities, with that information, can then begin to address trauma and poverty, which affect our families and cause the difficulties our state witnesses.  Diminishing schools, publicly humiliating the people who are hard at work in the fight to change these cycles, is harmful to the actual goal of helping those families. We have driven teachers out. (See reference 4)  There are hundreds of teaching vacancies.  Teachers continue to leave the state in droves, which is a bellwether for the state.  We should be looking for ways to bring them back and cheer for the ones who are still here, rather than denigrate the dedicated people who remain.

The hundreds of millions of dollars being spent on assessment each year would be better spent on food, clothing, shelter, therapy, and tutoring.  Acknowledging trauma and poverty as key issues is not “soft bigotry”, it is fact, which is lately out of fashion, but remains nonetheless.    To quote our school’s principal, “Nourishment, rather than measurement, is how a child grows.”  The people who would sell you the assessments and grades, and micromanagement down to a breath, couldn’t hold a candle to the principal at our school, or the many public servants that are my colleagues out there, who are doing the actual work.  But politicians should be trying to light candles, anyway, instead of constantly cursing this darkness. Their current course of action continues to add to the darkness.

Jeff Tuttle
Monte Vista Elementary School
Golden Apple Fellow


Linked References:

  1. A group of scientists and mathematicians from Sandia and Los Alamos National Laboratories, who had reviewed the school grading system, and said the math used to come with those grades was “something like adding oranges and cows to derive pickup trucks. The result is not obviously meaningful.”
  1. The trend nationally of this kind of misuse of math in data interpretation, in this example for “Value Added Models” of teacher evaluation, caused the entire American Statistical Association to publish a position paper in April of 2014 which warned “Most VAM studies find that teachers account for about 1% to 14% of the variability in test scores, and that the majority of opportunities for quality improvement are found in the system-level conditions.”  By this finding, 1% would be the most that test scores could be included in the evaluation of teachers, since there is not reliability in a number any higher.
  1. The author of NM’s teacher evaluation rubric, Charlotte Danielson, expresses her concern for the misuse of her work:


Filed under Uncategorized

Note to self #1((ish)


Anybody who has lived more than 10 years in a single place is witness to the fact that humans impact the environment around them.  This is observably true.  The notion that a large number of people have a large impact upon the natural world is not conjecture, except as a device to distract people who are viewed as potential competitors for resources.  Shutting the eyes, mouth and ears to the witness of the destruction of the natural world by firing scientists serves well the purpose of keeping possible competitors for resources in the dark.  A silencing of the lambs.  Although this may increase the speed and depth of devastation, it will preserve for a few a lifestyle and perhaps even a life.

Cooperation, rather than competition, which is to say democracy rather than capitalism, works to spread knowledge rather than limit it, creates the distributed processing of a problem and hope for a solution.  The active recruitment of the populous for critical thought rather than loyalty replaces cynicism with faith.

Instead of being lulled to sleep by the white noise at the top, we should continue to pique each other’s consciousness, and continue the discussion, and search for solutions to the problems we face.  This is an attempt to keep myself awake, I hope it is helpful for you, too.


Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Calling Scheherazade

Scheherazade, who saved herself by serialization, needs to stage a come-back and tell us a string of stories.  Not stories kissed with apocolypstic, but of survival, and thrival, but not tribal, if you know what I mean.   We need the positive imagined outcomes of humanity.  We need the narrative of peace and prosperity, compassion, and the continued existence of the variety of life on earth.   I know, it doesn’t sell on Netflix.   But we need to speak about possibilities and good outcomes, we need to make it popular to be unabashedly hopeful and forge a new reality, closer to the heart, as Rush have it.  



Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The thing that lasts

At the end of another school year, which always creates a slurry of emotions at the estuary of the single year and the rest of time, I think of things.

Did you see “National Treasure”?  I did, years ago.  I thought it was a fun pass down to the kids of the apex of our governance, that the peak we stand on is built on the long parade of unreasoning, and at last we have come to value reason over might, at least as a creed, if not always in action, but even with the articulation of that hope, we begin the journey toward it.   And although the metaphor was courted throughout the movie with a few good lines (“If there’s something wrong, those who have the ability to take action have the responsibility to take action”) – the literal manifestation of the National Treasure, which could have been the map itself, the long journey, on the back of the Declaration of Independence, the long work toward freedom; the movie manifest the greatest treasure passed down to be gold instead, because, well, people like me like shiny things.  But I don’t know if that delivered the goods, if you know what I mean.   I know a movie can’t be too preachy.  But hey, a central theme of humanity might be okay as a theme for movie climax, right?  To say, “hey, we’ve had the treasure all along, it is us, our lifestyle, our freedoms, the map we carry…”- maybe a be a bit too Wizard of Oz, I suppose.

I wonder though, why the things I think of as so utterly basic to who we are as a nation, seem to have slipped from common understanding.  I wonder where the breakdown occurred.

A former student asked if I had ever seen “Poltergeist”.  He was venturing into a change in our relationship- he was doing an “adult thing” by seeing a scary movie, and trying to relate on that adult realm, years after he was a student of mine.  “Yes!”  I said.  “I really liked the metaphor of how screens steal away our youth”.  By the look on his face, I could see the movie might not have delivered that to him, just yet.

I wonder about my own imperceptiveness, and what things, bigger and smaller I have missed.  Oceans are implied by the shells I have found.  I wonder what great recipes have not been passed down, or techniques have been lost.  I struggle with the idea that my own lack of awareness may bring discontinuity, even the death or extinction of something.  I’m certain it is true, in this, the Anthropocene.

So what lasts?  We know that our grandma’s experience becomes our genetic code.  Even more proximal, a mother’s milk, shaped by her own experiences, affects the “hardware” of the baby.  Down into the molecules, our behaviors manifest.  Out of the ether comes the matter.

I took some students to a farm, two years ago.  An organic farm, and the farmer was a spry 77 year old, doing work, speaking to the students with excellent illustration of earth to person affect.  I was spellbound, and asked if he had written his spiel down, made a book.  “No,” he said, “It would not hold the resonance of my voice.”   I don’t know what it means, really.  More shells, probably.  His response stuck to me, such an anachronistic thing.  A thing out of time.  Something that lasts with me.

What strands of thought, of DNA, how our love and lives be smithied into the collective conscious, or the legacy of individuals, I do not know.  So, back to the personal, the people I love, the moments that last with me.  Another year, and I have always been so lucky.


1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Keeping the Duel out of the Duality

cerebral_lobesThe two party system has its flaws, not the least of which is the tendency to polarize.  During this time, during any time, if we are going to stand as a nation, North and South, right and left, self and other, we must recognize the need for the opposing point of view.  We need to respect the fact that there is a source for the differences, and insist on a reasonable exchange.  We cannot win over the “other side” if we threaten them.  Name calling- nope.  Reason.  Tell me why you think that, and let me tell you why I think the way I do.  Keep the calm in the storm.  Value each other.  There are no expendables.  Democracy is the ends and the means, and includes all voices.  Each of us must insist on all of us.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The Great Virtue

Gen_Hugh_Milton.jpgIn my undergraduate work from 1984 to 1988 at NMSU, I had the privilege of working for the PBS station there, KRWG, doing some video work and editing.  I was neither here nor there about politics.  I had worked with Jim Laukes, who had done a series of oral interviews, largely focusing on the relationship of the National Labs and NMSU.

In editing some of the “teasers” for the episodes, there was one with Major General Hugh Milton that I remember.  There is a statue of General Milton outside of the Journalism building which also carried his name, when I went to school there.  This was the Reagan era, and I predicted that General Milton would be all about military might.  This was the Cold War, and I was young.

He said, “In a 100 years there has never been such change.  Do we understand it?  The answer is ‘no’.”   In the course of the interview, General Milton put his arm out on the table.  In talking about the Cold War build-up he continued…”Our country is hiding its greatest virtue under a bushel.  The might of The United States is not in strength of its weapons, but in the promise of freedom”.

It was a moment when my prejudices were exposed, and proven wrong, and I was humbled when I realized it.  I think of that now.  The great virtue of the promise of freedom.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized